{"id":9621,"date":"2025-06-04T09:41:56","date_gmt":"2025-06-04T13:41:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/?p=9621"},"modified":"2025-06-04T09:41:56","modified_gmt":"2025-06-04T13:41:56","slug":"johns-hopkins-study-shows-how-scientists-can-use-black-holes-as-supercolliders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/?p=9621","title":{"rendered":"Johns Hopkins Study Shows How Scientists Can Use Black Holes as Supercolliders"},"content":{"rendered":"
Artist\u2019s conception of a supermassive black hole, billions of times more massive than the sun, like those found at the centers of galaxies. The black hole\u2019s rapid spin and powerful magnetic fields can launch enormous jets of plasma into space, a process that could potentially generate the same results as human-made supercolliders.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As federal funding cuts impact decades of research, scientists could turn to black holes for cheaper, natural alternatives to expensive facilities searching for dark matter and similarly elusive particles that hold clues to the universe\u2019s deepest secrets, a new Johns Hopkins study of supermassive black holes suggests.<\/p>\n

The findings could help complement multi-billion-dollar expenses and decades of construction needed for research complexes like Europe\u2019s Large Hadron Collider, the largest and highest-energy particle accelerator in the world.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the great hopes for particle colliders like the Large Hadron Collider is that it will generate dark matter particles, but we haven\u2019t seen any evidence yet,\u201d said study co-author Joseph Silk<\/a>, an astrophysics professor at Johns Hopkins University and the University of Oxford, UK. \u201cThat\u2019s why there are discussions underway to build a much more powerful version, a next-generation supercollider. But as we invest $30 billion and wait 40 years to build this supercollider\u2014nature may provide a glimpse of the future in super massive black holes.\u201d<\/p>\n

The research appears today in Physical Review Letters<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Particle colliders smash protons and other subatomic particles into each other at nearly the speed of light, exposing the most fundamental aspects of matter. Subtle energy flashes and debris from the clash could reveal previously undiscovered particles, including potential candidates for dark matter, a critical but ghostly component of the universe that scientists have yet to detect. Facilities such as the Large Hadron Collider, a 17-mile circular tunnel, have also helped transform the internet, cancer therapy, and high-performance computing. <\/p>\n

A black hole can spin around its axis like a planet, but with much greater strength because of its intense gravitational field. Scientists are increasingly discovering that some rapidly spinning massive black holes at the centers of galaxies release enormous outbursts of plasma, likely because of jets powered by energy from their spin and surrounding accretion disks. It\u2019s these events that could potentially generate the same results as human-made supercolliders, the new study shows. <\/p>\n

\u201cIf supermassive black holes can generate these particles by high-energy proton collisions, then we might get a signal on Earth, some really high-energy particle passing rapidly through our detectors,\u201d said Silk, who is also a researcher at the Institute of Astrophysics in Paris and at the University of Oxford. \u201cThat would be the evidence for a novel particle collider within the most mysterious objects in the universe, attaining energies that would be unattainable in any terrestrial accelerator. We\u2019d see something with a strange signature that conceivably provides evidence for dark matter, which is a bit more of a leap but it\u2019s possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

The new study shows that plunging \u201cgas flows\u201d near a black hole can draw energy from its spin, becoming much more violent than scientists thought possible. Near a rapidly spinning black hole, these particles can chaotically collide. Although not identical, the process is similar to the collisions scientists create using intense magnetic fields to accelerate particles in the circular tunnel of a high-energy particle collider.<\/p>\n

\u201cSome particles from these collisions go down the throat of the black hole and disappear forever. But because of their energy and momentum, some also come out, and it\u2019s those that come out which are accelerated to unprecedentedly high energies,\u201d Silk said. \u201cWe figured out how energetic these beams of particles could be: as powerful as you get from a supercollider, or more. It\u2019s very hard to say what the limit is, but they certainly are up to the energy of the newest supercollider that we plan to build, so they could definitely give us complementary results.\u201d<\/p>\n

To detect such high-energy particles, scientists could use observatories already tracking supernovae, massive black hole eruptions, and other cosmic events, Silk said. These include detectors like the IceCube Neutrino Observatory in the South Pole or the Kilometer Cube Neutrino Telescope, which recently detected the most energetic neutrino ever recorded under the Mediterranean Sea.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe difference between a supercollider and a black hole is that black holes are far away,\u201d Silk said. \u201cBut nevertheless, these particles will get to us.\u201d <\/p>\n

Dr. Andrew Mummery<\/a>, a theoretical physicist at University of Oxford, is also an author of the study. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As federal funding cuts impact decades of research, scientists could turn to black holes for cheaper, natural alternatives to expensive facilities searching for dark matter and similarly elusive particles that hold clues to the universe\u2019s deepest secrets, a new Johns Hopkins study of supermassive black holes suggests. The findings could help complement multi-billion-dollar expenses and…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":71,"featured_media":9622,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/mediasvc.eurekalert.org\/Api\/v1\/Multimedia\/6ddf5cf6-5255-44e9-8b4f-73f1c01729f0\/Rendition\/low-res\/Content\/Public","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/71"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9621"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9621\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9623,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9621\/revisions\/9623"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}