{"id":8679,"date":"2022-12-09T03:38:17","date_gmt":"2022-12-09T08:38:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/?p=8679"},"modified":"2022-12-09T03:38:17","modified_gmt":"2022-12-09T08:38:17","slug":"astronomers-discover-enigmatic-cosmic-explosion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/?p=8679","title":{"rendered":"Astronomers Discover Enigmatic Cosmic Explosion"},"content":{"rendered":"
Artist\u2019s conception of a gamma-ray burst caused by the violent collision of two massive neutron stars, following their inspiraling danse macabre. In addition to high-energy radiation and matter spewed out in a narrow jet, the event is thought to be the Universe’s main factory of heavy elements, including gold and platinum.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Cosmic explosions:<\/p>\n

Gamma-ray bursts are the most powerful explosions in the Universe, resulting from either collapsing stars or from the collision of two compact stellar remnants. But a recent discovery fits in neither, or both, of these categories, challenging our understanding of their source. Astronomers from the Niels Bohr Institute played an important role in the study that may lead us to revise our theories about these violent events.<\/p>\n

Daniele Bj\u00f8rn Malesani was carrying out a routine follow-up observation of a gamma-ray burst, named GRB 211211A, using the Nordic Optical Telescope on the Canary island La Palma. A standard procedure after having received the text message that was automatically triggered by the spacecraft \u201cNeil Gehrels Swift Observatory\u201d which monitors the sky for gamma-ray bursts.<\/p>\n

But something wasn\u2019t quite right\u2026<\/p>\n

Malesani is an astronomer at Radboud University in the Netherlands, and a guest researcher at the Cosmic Dawn Center in Copenhagen. He expertizes in gamma-ray bursts, the most energetic explosions in the Universe.<\/p>\n

But to understand what wasn\u2019t right, let\u2019s first have a look at what is a \u201cgamma-ray burst\u201d:<\/p>\n

As bright as the Universe itself<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gamma-ray bursts are brief and ultra-bright flashes of the most energetic form of light, gamma-rays. Mostly detected in the very distant Universe, they generally come in two categories which are thought to arise from two different physical scenarios:<\/p>\n

\u201cLong\u201d bursts typically last from a few seconds to several minutes, but are often accompanied by a longer-lasting afterglow of less energetic light. They are found in the most star-forming regions of galaxies, and are thought to be the result of a massive star that collapses to a compact neutron star or a black hole, ejecting its outer parts in an immense explosion, similar to a supernova.<\/p>\n

\u201cShort\u201d bursts are even more fleeting, with typical durations of 1\/10 to 1 second. They are often seen offset from the galactic centers, or even outside galaxies. The prevailing theory is that they are the outcome of a two massive stars orbiting each other in a \u201cbinary\u201d system. At some point, they explode as supernovae, kicking them out of their host galaxy. Eventually, however, the two objects will spiral in and merge, resulting in a gamma-ray burst.<\/p>\n

In both cases, the energy released is mind-blowing: At their peak, they can shine as brightly as all the stars in the observable Universe combined (assuming that they emit light equally in all directions; in reality they are likely somewhat less bright, but emit most of their light in narrow jets, where we just happen to lie in this direction).<\/p>\n

Hubble Space Telescope view of the location of the gamma-ray bursts GRB 211211A and its surroundings. The zoom-in shows the afterglow of the burst, as observed with the Gemini North telescope on Hawaii. The binary system causing the burst was likely ejected in the past from the big, bluish galaxy on its left.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The enigmatic gamma-ray bursts<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gamma-ray bursts were first discovered in 1967 by the Vela satellite, built to monitor the sky for possible tests of nuclear weapons, which would be a violation of the 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. First thought to originate from nearby sources within our own galaxy, more sensitive space observatories revealed, in the 1990\u2019s, that they must come from far outside the Milky Way, distributed over the whole Universe.<\/p>\n

The transient nature of the bursts made them difficult to study, but from the late 1990\u2019s astronomers have been able to detect also their less energetic afterglow<\/em>, from X-rays to optical light, to the infrared, helping to establish a theory of their origin.<\/p>\n

Gamma-ray bursts come in two versions, \u201cshort\u201d and \u201clong\u201d, which have, until now, been thought to arise from two different physical mechanisms, namely the merging of two compact objects, and the collapse of a massive star, respectively. With the new observations, this theory is now being challenged.<\/p>\n

The Nordic Optical Telescope on the 2400 meters high mountain top Roche de los Muchachos in La Palma.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Mixed signals<\/strong><\/p>\n

So what was the issue with Malesani\u2019s burst, GRB 211211A? Well, it seemed to fit in neither, or perhaps both, of these categories. \u201cThe observations showed that the burst originated outside of a galaxy typical for hosting short bursts. But rather than being a millisecond or a few seconds, this beast lasted for almost a minute<\/em>,\u201d Malesani says.<\/p>\n

The peculiar event prompted an international team of astronomers, led by Jillian Rastinejad of Northwestern University (USA), to begin an intensive campaign to study this surprising object. These efforts led to the completely unexpected discovery of a so-called kilonova<\/em>, the smoking-gun proof of the collision of two neutron stars, or a neutron star and a black hole.<\/p>\n

Binary neutron star mergers are widely considered the progenitors of short gamma-ray bursts. Why this one was instead followed by a long burst puzzled the astronomers.<\/p>\n

Luca Izzo, astronomer at the DARK research section at the Niels Bohr Institute, participated in the study. He comments: \u201cGamma-ray bursts can show a variety of behaviors, but the distinction between long and short events has been clearly established since the 1990s, and is considered one of the pillars in the field. This finding caught us really by surprise<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

A new engine for making gold?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kilonovae are thought to be the main mechanism for creating heavy elements such as the precious silver, gold, and platinum, the radioactive plutonium and uranium, as well as many others. As always in physics, a definite proof that a kilonova is responsible for the long gamma-ray burst does not exist. <\/p>\n

When the astronomers nevertheless are confident in their interpretation, it is due to several circumstances. Johan Fynbo, professor at the Cosmic Dawn Center and partaker in the study, explains:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe afterglow of the burst showed colors and features that are consistent with a kilonova, and which haven\u2019t been seen for any other types of objects. Moreover, we would not expect to see a collapsing star outside of a galaxy, since traveling this far takes hundreds <\/em>of millions of years, while massive stars collapse on timescales less than 10 million years<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

But in principle, GRB 211211A could be a collapsar inside a faint or dusty, undetected galaxy, although the Hubble images are indeed very deep and ought to have seen this. \u201cFollow-up observations with the more sensitive ALMA radio telescopes in Chile, or the James Webb Space Telescope, would be able to settle this issue<\/em>,\u201d Fynbo remarks.<\/p>\n

If the interpretation turns out to be correct, it not only opens up for an exciting new mechanism for kilonovae to form heavy elements. It is also a strong motivation for looking for new kilonovae at the position of long bursts.<\/p>\n

\u201cKilonovae are a relatively new and unexplored phenomenon to us; to this day, we have only detected a few<\/em>,\u201d explains Daniele Bj\u00f8rn Malesani. \u201cBecause we didn\u2019t expect them to be associated with long bursts, we have not been looking for them there. But now we know that Nature is more resourceful than we previously thought<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

From a previous study in 2006, the three astronomers had a hint that colliding neutron stars might be able to keep their engines active for longer than just a few seconds. But without a kilonova detection the evidence had been confusing. One theory is that the collapsed neutron stars may spin so fast \u2014 at a significant fraction of the speed of light \u2014 that centrifugal forces can sustain the merged object for a little while and postpone its gloomy fate.<\/p>\n

Future observations of more long bursts from kilonovae will teach us more about this exciting phenomenon. The findings<\/a> have just been published in the scientific journal Nature<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cosmic explosions: Gamma-ray bursts are the most powerful explosions in the Universe, resulting from either collapsing stars or from the collision of two compact stellar remnants. But a recent discovery fits in neither, or both, of these categories, challenging our understanding of their source. Astronomers from the Niels Bohr Institute played an important role in…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":71,"featured_media":8682,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/earimediaprodweb.azurewebsites.net\/Api\/v1\/Multimedia\/87697c5e-54f7-4ab6-97a6-d644813b3412\/Rendition\/low-res\/Content\/Public","fifu_image_alt":"Astronomers Discover Enigmatic Cosmic Explosion","footnotes":""},"categories":[215],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-stars"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/71"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8679"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8679\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8681,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8679\/revisions\/8681"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceandplanetarynewswire.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}